Best MacBook Pro 16 alternative. Best 14-inch 2-in-1 alternative. Apple put in AMD GPu's, that is fine by me, but come on, give us some more support for them! Normal windows PC (for 800€) with nvidia GPU is faster at rendering in Illustrator, than my workstation mac (3500+€)! Really? O.oHP Envy x360 13. However, it is quite possible to upgrade the internal 'blade' SSD in the Cylinder Mac Pro and external storage also is readily available.Now I'm thinking, that buying the new mac pro 2013 maybe wasn't the best idea. The SSD in the Cylinder Mac Pro is fast, but users who like to have a number of internal drives may prefer to stick with an older Mac Pro model for a while longer.First, go to the Github page to download macOS Sierra cursors for Windows.On the page, click on the Code dropdown menu and select the. •How to Install Mac Cursor in Windows 10 To make Windows cursor look like mac os cursor, follow the steps listed here. The Pro upgrade accepts product keys from.How to Download & Install Mac OS Cursor in Windows 10 Best law From Law Details: It gives the report after completing the job in HTML format.It's kinda sad, that on my girlfriend's PC I can play games with better frames and details on GF 660GTX than on my mac pro. Well in practice it is much of unused potential and great room warmer. Sometimes I even play some games on my mac and sometimes I'm testing them (I'm artist, but I also like to develop and test some games in my free time) and it's kinda a shame, that I can run games with better performance under windows in bootcamp.When I bought this computer I thought this is going to rock and sweep up with all my previous machines. 299.89.And there is one more thing: new mac pro, has 2 identical AMD GPU's inside, which can work in crossfire configuration under windows in bootcamp, but not in OS X.
Replacement Windows Workstation Pro 2013 Upgrade The InternalThat might even help at rendering some 3D scenes?Next step would probably be better cooperation with software developers, like Adobe , Autodesk. First would be a good steep adding crossfire support to OS X. No, just start thinking of adding more support and things that would make our computers much more used and not only good decoration on desk. But support to use all computer capabilities is very limited and Apple should kick developers in their back side and push them to start developing things to use GPU's more.I'm also not expecting Apple to jump on their feet and fix problems overnight. Where went wrong?Don't take me wrong and think I'm just ranting here without any good reason, but think: buying very expensive computer that is supposed to make creative work easy and painless is actually just on paper. Photoshop is working much better on OS X and here I have much better integration and everything and I really love working in Photoshop running on OS X, but some basic things are missing and I'm really asking myself sometimes: was that good decision? Photoshop was first written for macs and in 2014 there is much better support for adobe software on windows than on OS X. I'm sometimes having a lot of paths and objects and rendering goes pretty slow then.I'm also thinking about that AMD choice Apple made wasn't so good when you see that Nvidia puts much more effort into supporting more and more stuff, while AMD is sitting idle not even updating their drivers anymore.Oh and one more thing: Can we please, please, please, please, preeeeeetty please get 10-bit output support on OS X? It's kinda sad, having good mac workstation with 10-bit capable monitor (dell UP2414Q) and no support for it, while other PC workstations all support it. Overwatch mac emulatorI hope someone from Apple reads this and give us some feedback on those missing things or maybe I get direction where to write to Apple so I get maybe some response from them(?):-not enough GPU support for creative software (adobe suite, autodesk.) - nvidia + windows offering much more for less money?-no crossfire support on OS X. Now I would like to point this out to Apple, so I don't know where to write so they will read so I first wrote that here. They are great piece of equipment, but equivalent PC's running windows are surpassing them in this department, specially when GPU's are involved. The second GPU is reserved for un-interrupted GPU computing and has no Display output Hardware.Anandtech has a discussion of this in his review of the late 2013 Mac Pro.Under OS X the situation is a bit more complicated. Apple isn't doing much to get more support or developers just too lazy to put more effort into this? GPGPU isn't the future as some companies are trying to convince us?All displays are supported by one GPU - the display GPU. Why not? Hardware is capable, why software isn't?-lack of openCL software out there. What about 3D modelling and 2D work in photosohp? And maybe people like me are occasionally wish to play some games on their mac?You linked me GPU usage from one program (probably adobe after effects or premiere pro or apple final cut X?), that is probably one of the only pieces of software that actually uses both GPU's under OS X. It would be nice to have an option to switch on and off crossfire so we could use more rendering power when needed.Also not all people are doing video rendering on their computers. As I wrote, sometimes it would be better to get more rendering power than computing power (actually at current state of GPU computing software, computing GPU isn't working very much if at all). NVIDIA sought to address a similar problem with their Maximus technology , combining Quadro and Tesla cards into a single system for display and compute.Another problem here: on windows bootcamp crossfire IS working, but not in OS X. GPUs are notoriously bad at context switching, which can severely limit compute performance if the GPU also has to deal with the rendering workloads associated with display in a modern OS. So it -CAN- be done.Despite promises to adopt OpenCL, Adobe has moaned that this is too much work and has not made the investments needed to make this work. Apple provided two excellent GPUs and took their flagship product, Final Cut, and made it run really fast using OpenCL and the methods they suggested everyone adopt. Wouldn't be better to at least use second GPU for something than heating air?Apple suggested that developers use OpenCL for good fast results that do not depend on closed, proprietary solutions from one vendor. Even when some stuff is using openCL in Photoshop, stuff is still computed on rendering GPU and not on computing one, which makes computing GPU just a good room warmer as I wrote before. Yes, some of the Bugs will be Apple Bugs. Attempting to apportion blame Apple Adobe is pointless. Adobe has said they are doing so, but has not delivered on their promises. ![]() I'm more painting than editing stuff in Photoshop and I use brush based tools most of the time and sometimes they lag like crazy. Having only few filters is not enough. But when you go research a little deeper, you see those monitors aren't so special and they don't have 10-bit panels.-Very bad or almost no GPU acceleration for other adobe programs. When I was buying computer I thought macs are supporting it and Apple is advertising their TB monitors as superior one and price tag is the same: superior. □-No GPU accelerating of vector graphics - GPU's love vectors!-No 10-bit support (yay for buying 1100€ monitor with 10-bit support only to discover my mac just doesn't support it.). But boy I was wrong and at the moment it seems like a bad investment of too big pile of money.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorPaulo ArchivesCategories |